Page 1 of 1

the new pokemon are inferior

Posted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 11:26 am
by kajukha
Who agrees that the new pokemon are inferior to the old ones? Does anyone share my view that the new pokemon, as a whole, tend to look more like robots? I am thinking of Dialga, Palkia, Registeel etc. Whilst the games I find amazing, does anyone agree that they should stop making so many legendaries and evolutions of old pokemon? (I think having all these new pre-evolutions and even more evolutions is pointless, rhyperior, lickilicky etc). I found the old ones far more enjoyable as they were less complicated!
___________________________
yahoo keyword tool ~ overture ~ traffic estimator ~ adwords traffic estimator

Re: the new pokemon are inferior

Posted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 1:03 pm
by lolificated
Regis are cooler than lugia

Re: the new pokemon are inferior

Posted: Wed Aug 04, 2010 6:41 am
by carousiex
NO LUGIA IS BETTER! LUGUI CAN PWN REGIS!

Re: the new pokemon are inferior

Posted: Thu Aug 05, 2010 4:49 am
by synn90210
I think that when it got to jhoto it was at its best. hoenn....slow decline....sinnoh is just bullshit and idfk what this new place is called. all i do know is that my charizard/typhlosion/blaiziken would kick the shit out of this smugleaf thing....