Who agrees that the new pokemon are inferior to the old ones? Does anyone share my view that the new pokemon, as a whole, tend to look more like robots? I am thinking of Dialga, Palkia, Registeel etc. Whilst the games I find amazing, does anyone agree that they should stop making so many legendaries and evolutions of old pokemon? (I think having all these new pre-evolutions and even more evolutions is pointless, rhyperior, lickilicky etc). I found the old ones far more enjoyable as they were less complicated!
___________________________
yahoo keyword tool ~ overture ~ traffic estimator ~ adwords traffic estimator
the new pokemon are inferior
Last edited by kajukha on Sat Aug 07, 2010 11:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
lolificated
- Papulatus
- Posts:1149
- Joined:Sun Jan 25, 2009 7:55 pm
- Location:prison shower room
- Contact:
Re: the new pokemon are inferior
Regis are cooler than lugia
Re: the new pokemon are inferior
NO LUGIA IS BETTER! LUGUI CAN PWN REGIS!
Re: the new pokemon are inferior
I think that when it got to jhoto it was at its best. hoenn....slow decline....sinnoh is just bullshit and idfk what this new place is called. all i do know is that my charizard/typhlosion/blaiziken would kick the shit out of this smugleaf thing....